![]() What the disappointing Infinite Warfare results really mean-and, by the way, it was still the best-selling game of the holidays-is that this series will not continue.Īnd since most of you probably don’t realize this, it’s not the first time it’s happened. ![]() That new game was locked down a long time ago. So the “setting” of the 2016 title, has no bearing on the coming 2017 title. That’s why there are three studios making these games, with one release each year. Which is incorrect.įolks, Call of Duty games take years to make. This is what our dedicated community of Call of Duty players and Sledgehammer Games, developing this year’s title, are the most excited about.īut then everyone-including the gaming press, who should know better-attributed the 2017 change to the lack of success of the 2016 title. In 2017, Activision will take Call of Duty back to its roots, and traditional combat will once again take center stage. But it also had a setting that didn’t appeal to all of our fans. Infinite Warfare had a ton of great gameplay innovations. But people misunderstand Activision’s new direction for the series.ĭuring a financial earnings conference call this week, Activision Blizzard COO Eric Hirshberg admitted that the latest Call of Duty game, Infinite Warfare, hasn’t met the firm’s lofty expectations. I’m not surprised that Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare hasn’t met expectations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |